Here's a study released today that analyzed Syndicated Op-Ed columnists in papers all across the country. And guess what they found:
- Sixty percent of the nation's daily newspapers print more conservative syndicated columnists every week than progressive syndicated columnists. Only 20 percent run more progressives than conservatives, while the remaining 20 percent are evenly balanced.
- In a given week, nationally syndicated progressive columnists are published in newspapers with a combined total circulation of 125 million. Conservative columnists, on the other hand, are published in newspapers with a combined total circulation of more than 153 million.2
- The top 10 columnists as ranked by the number of papers in which they are carried include five conservatives, two centrists, and only three progressives.
- The top 10 columnists as ranked by the total circulation of the papers in which they are published also include five conservatives, two centrists, and only three progressives.
- In 38 states, the conservative voice is greater than the progressive voice -- in other words, conservative columns reach more readers in total than progressive columns. In only 12 states is the progressive voice greater than the conservative voice.
- In three out of the four broad regions of the country -- the West, the South, and the Midwest -- conservative syndicated columnists reach more readers than progressive syndicated columnists. Only in the Northeast do progressives reach more readers, and only by a margin of 2 percent.
- In eight of the nine divisions into which the U.S. Census Bureau divides the country, conservative syndicated columnists reach more readers than progressive syndicated columnists in any given week. Only in the Middle Atlantic division do progressive columnists reach more readers each week.
2 comments:
Why is the whole blog "conservative" vs. "progressive"? Is this to say that conservative thought holds us back while the only "true" path to enlightenment is liberalism? If you're a liberal, don't pretend to be something else. If that makes you happy, admit it and be proud of it. Don't hide behind a subliminal alternative term.
The whole blog is conservative vs. progressive because it's about the report I linked to and am talking about. This report studied op-ed pages and only looked at conservative and progressive columnists. If they had looked at Greens vs. Libertarians, then I would have written about that.
Did you even click on the link?
And if you would have read the paragraph at the end of this blog, you would have seen that I talked about "not hearing all sides of an issue and obviously not letting all sides have equal air & print time."
I said "all" sides. Other blogs I have written on here talk specifically about not getting ALL sides and viewpoints heard: Republican, Democratic, Libertarian, Green, Constitutional Party, etc.
So, I don't see how you think I'm focusing on one side only and that I'm hiding behind anything.
Post a Comment